Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background And Study Aims: The diagnosis of anorectal dynamic disorders and perineal insufficiency has been mainly based up to now on the use of defecography. Here, we performed a prospective blinded study to evaluate the accuracy of a new procedure, dynamic anorectal endosonography (DAE), by comparing it with defecography.
Patients And Methods: A total of 43 women (mean age 53), presenting with outlet obstruction, were prospectively enrolled in our study. The DAE was performed with a 7.5-Mhz linear probe (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) with basal and straining recordings. None of the DAE or defecography operators was informed about the results of the respective other investigation.
Results: Defecography showed a descending perineum in 29 patients (68%), a rectocele in 25 patients (58%), and a rectal intussusception in eight patients (18%). The rate of concordance between the diagnosis of descending urinary bladder at DAE and descending perineum at defecography was 35/43 (80%), and that between the descending puborectal muscle at DAE and descending perineum at defecography was 40/43 (93 %). The rates of concordance between DAE and defecography for the diagnosis of rectocele and rectal intussusception were 27/43 patients (57%) and 34/43 patients (80%), respectively. In the last 15 patients, the DAE technique was adapted in order to improve the accuracy for diagnosing rectocele by filling the rectum with water. This improved sensitivity from 36 to 86% and accuracy from 57 to 87%.
Conclusions: DAE is a new imaging approach to anorectal dynamic disorders, providing a highly reliable means of diagnosing perineal insufficiency as well as rectocele. DAE should be substituted for previous methods since it makes it possible at the same time to assess the anal sphincters and to avoid pelvic irradiation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-7385 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!