A case is reported which questions the absolute significance of the "double-lumen sign" in the diagnosis of arterial dissection. I suggest that when demonstrated in isolation, this sign should be interpreted with caution, giving consideration to the possibility of arterial fenestration, and appropriate diagnostic measures implemented.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002340050046 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!