Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A time series analysis of 23-years observations of the Ixodes persulcatus imago dynamics was carried out. The tick were counted in forests of the western Sikhote-Alin' foothills near Ussuriysk. The fluctuations of the ticks number are quasiperiodical. They are formed by near 3-years oscillations, long-term non linear trend and accidental component. The observed process was described by means of a statistic model. This model combines the harmonic regression analysis with linear regression analysis. The determination coefficients are 90.8% and 92.7% for the descriptive and prognostic models respectively. The difference between two groups of environmental factors, which influence on the tick number, is discussed. These factors are: 1) the directly influencing factors (functional factors), 2) the factors influencing by dint of natural rhythms being general for a biocoenosis (synchronizing factors).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!