Background: Acute mesenteric ischemia can be a difficult diagnosis to make, but delay contributes directly to infarction, and this may provide a setting for malpractice claims.

Methods: We reviewed 180 consecutive malpractice claims submitted by attorneys for medical expert (ME) review during the 12 years ending in late 1998. Seven cases involved acute mesenteric ischemia.

Results: Alleged failure to make a timely diagnosis was the basis for 5 of these claims, failure to provide anticoagulant protection for 1, and failure to prevent nonocclusive ischemic infarction for 1. Six claims were closed after ME review and 1 claim involving late diagnosis was settled before trial.

Conclusions: The risk of a malpractice claim is reduced by consideration of computed tomography (CT), angiography, and surgical consultation as soon as a patient is seen whose differential diagnosis includes acute mesenteric ischemia.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acute mesenteric
16
mesenteric ischemia
12
malpractice claims
8
acute
4
malpractice
4
ischemia malpractice
4
claims
4
claims background
4
background acute
4
ischemia difficult
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!