The famous polemics between I. P. Pavlov and K. S. Lashley in the pages of the "Psychological Review" in the thirties is discussed in this paper. The particular significance of this polemics for development of contemporary neuroscience is underlined, since the essentially novel concept of the brain activity mechanisms has been advanced and intelligence nature has been advanced on the basis of the synthesis of the two opposing theories, the localizationalism and equipotentialism.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Flux estimation using isotopic tracers: common ground for metabolic physiology and metabolic engineering.
Metab Eng
April 2001
Department of Physiology, George Washington University Medical Center, 2300 Eye Street NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Metabolic physiologists and metabolic engineers share the need to estimate flux. However, the physiologist often works with systems that do not maintain steady state for long. Many sites cannot be sampled, and calculating mass and isotopic balance for the entire system may not be feasible.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF[A physiologist's dialog with a psychologist].
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova
March 2000
Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
The famous polemics between I. P. Pavlov and K.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!