A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of a state definition of an "emergency medical condition" legislation on medicaid managed care organization reimbursement. | LitMetric

Effect of a state definition of an "emergency medical condition" legislation on medicaid managed care organization reimbursement.

Ann Emerg Med

Department of Emergency Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Published: March 2000

Study Objective: The state of Michigan passed Public Act 136 of 1997 requiring Medicaid managed care organizations (MMCOs) to pay for emergency services whenever presenting symptoms constituted an "emergency medical condition." The objective of this study was to evaluate MMCO reimbursement before and after enactment of this state law.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparison of reimbursement for lacerations needing repair (identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes from computerized billing data) for 2 time periods (before the state law was applicable [January through March 1998] and after the state law was applicable [April through June 1998]) from MMCO enrollees in 7 different MMCOs presenting to 4 urban emergency departments. Three months after billing submission was allowed for payment. Only refusal of reimbursement was evaluated. Data were analyzed using chi(2) and Fisher's exact test (values of P <.05 were considered significant).

Results: The total number of MMCO patients evaluated/total number of ED patients evaluated for the 2 periods was 1,769/32,646 and 3, 376/30,901, respectively (P <.05). The number of MMCO lacerations with no reimbursement/total number of MMCO lacerations for the 2 periods was 4/135 (3%) and 78/196 (40%), respectively (P <.001).

Conclusion: Reimbursement by MMCOs for a procedure chosen to reflect a state-defined "emergency medical condition" is inadequate and significantly decreased during the 2 periods, with a significant increase in MMCO patients evaluated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70081-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

"emergency medical
8
medical condition"
8
medicaid managed
8
managed care
8
state law
8
law applicable
8
state
5
state definition
4
definition "emergency
4
condition" legislation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!