Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In women with contact bleeding or vaginal discharge, cervical smears are often made to exclude the possibility of cervical carcinoma. During the past ten years, several women sued pathologists for failure to diagnose cervical cancer because of false-negative results entailing a diagnostic delay of years. This, however, is unjustifiable: clinicians have to consider the aim of performing a test and always have to interpret the outcome within the clinical context. If the indication for testing is to exclude cervical cancer with enough certainty, a false-negative rate possibly as high as 45% makes the smear definitely unsuitable for this aim.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!