Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Follow-ups in 21 patients with 30 fractures of the lower jaw which were treated with stable plate osteosynthesis showed that 94% of the teeth adjacent to the fracture line were not extracted. The rate of secondary healing was 7%. Evaluation of the periodontal conditions showed that only 14% of the teeth were not worth keeping and 45% of the teeth required treatment. It is pointed out that when treating mandibular fractures with stable plate osteosynthesis, retention of the teeth in the fracture line does not mean an increased risk as far as secondary healing and the tooth itself are concerned.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!