Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08196.x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
An evidence-based cesarean section suggested for universal use.
J Perinat Med
September 2021
The New European Surgical Academy (NESA), Berlin, Germany.
Objectives: This article suggests a unified way to perform Cesarean sections. Even in the same departments, different modifications are in use. Therefore, one cannot rely on the early or late outcome of the procedure as long as all the surgical steps are not standardized.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison of the Joel-Cohen-based technique and the transverse Pfannenstiel for caesarean section for safety and effectiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Med J Islam Repub Iran
September 2017
School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Caesarean section (C-section) is the most common surgery among women worldwide, and the global rate of this surgical procedure has been continuously rising. Hence, it is significantly crucial to develop and apply highly effective and safe caesarean section techniques. In this review study, we aimed at assessing the safety and effectiveness of the Joel-Cohen-based technique and comparing the results with the transverse Pfannenstiel incision for C-section.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe choice of the type of abdominal incision performed in caesarean delivery is made chiefly on the basis of the individual surgeon's experience and preference. A general consensus on the most appropriate surgical technique has not yet been reached. The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to compare the two most commonly used transverse abdominal incisions for caesarean delivery, the Pfannenstiel incision and the modified Joel-Cohen incision, in terms of acute and chronic post-surgical pain and their subsequent influence in terms of quality of life.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature.
J Prenat Med
August 2015
Department of Gynecologic Ultrasound Imaging, Altamedica Fetal Maternal Medical Centre, Rome, Italy.
In the last decades cesarean section rates increased in many countries becoming the most performed intraperitoneal surgical procedure. Despite its worldwide spread, a general consensus on the most appropriate technique to use has not yet been reached. The operative technique performed is made chiefly on the basis of the individual experience and preference of operators, the characteristics of patients, timing and urgency of intervention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section.
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc
March 2014
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Bengal Medical College, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.
Objective: Pfanennstiel incision is the most commonly used incision for cesarean section, but may not be the best. This study compared the modified Joel-Cohen incision with the Pfannenstiel incision to evaluate whether techniques to open the abdomen might influence operative time, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Material And Methods: In a randomized comparative trial, 302 women with gestational age >34 weeks, requiring cesarean section, were randomly assigned to either modified Joel-Cohen incision or Pfannenstiel incision for entry into the peritoneal cavity.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!