Objectives: To assess the efficacy of an ultrasound scan at the first antenatal visit.

Design: Randomised clinical trial.

Setting: Women's and Children's tertiary level hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

Population: Six hundred and forty-eight women attending for their first antenatal visit at less than 17 weeks of gestation who had no previous ultrasound scan in the pregnancy, who were expected to give birth at the hospital, and for whom there was no indication for an ultrasound at their first visit.

Methods: Eligible consenting women were enrolled by telephone randomisation into either the ultrasound at first visit group, who had an ultrasound at the time of their first antenatal visit, or the control group in whom no ultrasound assessment was done at their first antenatal visit. Both groups of women completed a questionnaire at the end of the first visit on their feelings towards the pregnancy and anxiety levels. Data were collected on details of any ultrasound assessments, including the 18 to 20 weeks morphology scan, and pregnancy outcome. All primary analyses were on an intention-to-treat basis.

Main Outcome Measures: The number of women who needed adjustment in dates of 10 days or more on the basis of their 18 to 20 weeks ultrasound morphology scan, who were booked for their morphology scan at sub-optimal gestations, who had a repeat of their maternal serum screening test, or who felt worried about their pregnancy at the end of the first antenatal visit.

Results: Fewer women (9%) in the ultrasound at first visit group needed adjustment of their expected date of delivery as a result of the 18 to 20 week ultrasound, compared with 18% of women in the control group (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.79; P = 0.002). The number of women who had the 18 to 20 week ultrasound assessment timed suboptimally was similar to that in the control group (16% vs. 21%), as was the number of women who had a repeat blood sample taken for maternal serum screening (6% vs. 6%). Fewer women in the ultrasound at first visit group reported feeling worried about their pregnancy (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.99; P = 0.04) or not feeling relaxed about their pregnancy (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.96; P = 0.02), compared with women in the control group.

Conclusions: A routine ultrasound assessment for dating offered to women at the first antenatal visit provides more precise estimates of gestational age and reduces the need to adjust the estimate of the date of delivery in mid-gestation. Women who had an ultrasound at the first visit reported more positive feelings about their pregnancy, compared with women in the control group at that time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08181.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antenatal visit
20
ultrasound assessment
16
ultrasound visit
16
control group
16
ultrasound
15
women
13
visit group
12
morphology scan
12
number women
12
women ultrasound
12

Similar Publications

Problem: Despite solid evidence and national recommendations supporting midwife-led continuity-of-care models, Danish women's access to such programs remains limited.

Background: A public birth facility introduced a midwife-led continuity-of-care model, targeting a subset of women receiving antenatal and intrapartum care.

Aim: To compare care satisfaction during pregnancy and birth and birth experience between women receiving midwife-led continuity of care and those receiving standard midwifery care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains a leading public health challenge. It accounts for one-third of the under-five mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study applied the composite index of anthropometric failure (CIAF) to assess the prevalence of various standalone and coexisting forms of undernutrition and identify associated risk factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Syphilis Infection During Pregnancy: The Possible Effect on the Course of Pregnancy and Fetal Outcomes-A Case Report and Literature Review.

Biomedicines

January 2025

Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.

A wide range of syphilis-related pregnancy complications are encountered in clinical practice. Active surveillance of the epidemiological situation in different countries and a series of retrospective data analyses allow for a comprehensive assessment of the feasible consequences of syphilis infection during pregnancy. The negative effects of infection on reproductive health are also described.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effect of Health Education Intervention on Knowledge and Adherence to Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy Among Women.

Healthcare (Basel)

January 2025

Department of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Basic Medical and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Nelson Mandela Drive Campus, Mthatha 5117, South Africa.

Malaria in pregnancy is a global health problem because it causes anemia in the mother and may result in abortion, stillbirth, uterine growth retardation, and low birth weight in the newborn. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of HEI on knowledge and adherence to intermittent preventive treatment of malaria among pregnant women at secondary health facilities in Benue State, Nigeria. This quasi-experimental study included pre-, intervention, and post-intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Birth-related mortality is significantly increased by home births without skilled medical assistance during delivery, presenting a major risk to the public's health. The objective of this study is to predict home delivery and identify the determinants using machine learning algorithm in sub-Saharan African.

Methods: This study used design science approaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!