This article reviews and evaluates the literature related to the effectiveness of protective restraints on abdominal strength, lower back injuries, and workers' discomfort. The studies indicate that back belts have potential disadvantages as well as advantages. Belts seem to reduce lifting stress. They may, however, lead to a false sense of security while being worn and may also weaken the body, so injury occurs when they are not being worn. There also seems to be comfort problems with some belts. More scientific research is needed before any conclusions can be drawn about positive, negative, or long-term effects of lifting belts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10803548.1995.11076326 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Comprehensive risk assessment of the patient transfer task using the walking belt and floor lift.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol
January 2025
Neurorehabilitation Engineering and Assistance Systems Research (NEAR), School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) during bed-to-wheelchair and wheelchair-to-commode transfers are a significant concern, yet prior assessments often focused on specific subtasks, overlooking potential cumulative risks. This study employed Xsens Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) and force plates integrated with an automated Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) system to provide a continuous and comprehensive evaluation of WMSDs risks associated with the use of a walking belt and a floor lift. The continuous assessment revealed peak REBA scores ranging from 8.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFeasibility of a novel back support device to improve spine stability and muscular activity during trunk flexion: A prospective cross-sectional study with healthy controls and low back pain subjects - preliminary.
Clin Biomech (Bristol)
December 2024
Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St. W, Montréal, H3A 0G4, Québec, Canada; Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Research Institute MUHC, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal H3G 1A4, Québec, Canada. Electronic address:
Background: Low back pain is a prevalent global condition often challenging to address due to the absence of a definitive diagnosis in over 80 % of cases. Manual lifting, common in many work environments, contributes to low back pain due to lumbar spine stresses, and existing assistive technologies like abdominal belts and exoskeletons have limitations in managing low back pain effectively. This paper presents a novel back support device designed to generate abdominal compression during flexion activities, potentially enhancing lumbar stability through increased intra-abdominal pressure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRear passenger restraint in frontal NCAP tests compared to the right-front passenger.
Traffic Inj Prev
November 2024
ProBiomechanics LLC, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
Objective: This study compared kinematic and biomechanic responses of the 5 female Hybrid III in the right-rear and right-front passenger seats in frontal NCAP tests with 2015-16 MY vehicles. It focused on the lap-shoulder belt restraint of the rear passenger.
Methods: Eleven frontal NCAP tests were conducted by NHTSA at 56 km/h with a lap-shoulder belted 5 Hybrid III dummy in the right-rear and right-front seats.
Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.
Traffic Inj Prev
March 2023
ProBiomechanics LLC, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
Objective: In rear impacts, the seat and seatbelt are intended to provide occupant restraint and maintain the occupant on the seat with favorable kinematics and low biomechanical responses. This study analyzes the lack of restraint provided by lap-shoulder belts in rear impacts with and without pretensioning and offers thoughts on ways to provide early restraint by seatbelts.
Methods: Rear sled tests were conducted at 40.
Are sEMG, Velocity and Power Influenced by Athletes' Fixation in Paralympic Powerlifting?
Int J Environ Res Public Health
March 2022
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Study of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.
The bench press is performed in parapowerlifting with the back, shoulders, buttocks, legs and heels extended over the bench, and the use of straps to secure the athlete to the bench is optional. Thus, the study evaluated muscle activation, surface electromyography (sEMG), maximum velocity (MaxV) and mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and power in paralympic powerlifting athletes under conditions tied or untied to the bench. Fifteen experienced Paralympic powerlifting male athletes (22.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!