Comparison of Two Methods for Judging Distances Near Overhead Power Lines.

Int J Occup Saf Ergon

b Institut de recherche en santé et sécurité du travail du Québec , Canada.

Published: January 1996

Sixteen certified crane operators performed several series of boom movements toward a segment of a typical power line using a 100-ton lifting capacity crane equipped with an 18-m boom, a single lifting cable, and a hard ball hook. The operators were instructed to stop the crane movement when the lifting cable reached the edge of the danger zone located 3 m from the power line. To achieve each maneuver, they evaluated the distance between the nearest wire and their crane using two methods: free sighting and the use of highly visible markers delineating the edge of the danger zone. The dependent measure was the distance between the lifting cable and the edge of the danger zone. Results showed that operators were generally unreliable when judging the distance between their crane and the power line when sighting the power line directly, but the use of markers proved to be much more precise and reliable in targeting the edge of the danger zone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10803548.1996.11076348DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

edge danger
16
danger zone
16
lifting cable
12
power
5
crane
5
comparison methods
4
methods judging
4
judging distances
4
distances overhead
4
overhead power
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!