Objective: To determine the incidence and natural history of stage T1a-T1b prostate cancer in patients undergoing surgery for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), and thus evaluate the effect that recent medical and 'minimally invasive' treatments (which provide no prostate sample for pathological examination) might have on the percentage of patients with unsuspected prostate cancer.
Patients And Methods: A series of 1648 patients undergoing surgery for BPH over a 13-year period were reviewed retrospectively; the period overlapped the introduction of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a detection method.
Results: Stage T1 prostate cancer was found in 182 patients (11%), comprising 126 (11%) of 1199 transurethral resections and 56 (12%) of 449 open enucleations. The introduction of systematic PSA assays gradually reduced the mean incidence of T1 cancer from 23% to 7%, with a greater effect on T1b (from 15% to 2%), while the incidence of T1a remained nearly constant (+/-5%). The pathological features of surgical specimens from 43 radical prostatectomies undertaken for T1 tumours were reviewed. Locally advanced disease (stage >/=pT3) was apparent in 13% of T1a and 28% of T1b tumours. Amongst the patients electing for surveillance, only 8% of those with T1a progressed within 30-97 months of follow-up (mean progression time 73 months), whereas 29% of those with stage T1b progressed within 36 months of follow-up (mean progression time 17 months).
Conclusion: These results show that the use of the PSA assay has decreased but not suppressed the incidence of pT1 prostate cancer, with a greater effect on those tumours at higher risk of progression (T1b). This suggests that the detection of prostate cancer based on PSA and transrectal ultrasonography is appropriate for screening patients and is sufficiently accurate that treatments for BPH that provide no pathological materials can be applied safely.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00386.x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
[Treatment algorithm following first-line therapy failure in metastatic prostate cancer].
Urologie
January 2025
Klinik für Urologie, Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Deutschland.
This article provides a comprehensive overview of the current treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following the failure of first-line therapy. Although significant progress has been made in the primary treatment of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, the management of mCRPC remains a clinical challenge. The article outlines the diagnostic criteria for mCRPC, which can be confirmed through biochemical progression and imaging techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF[Next generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular panel analysis for metastatic prostate cancer: how often can we detect druggable mutations? : NGS for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate].
Urologie
January 2025
Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50927, Köln, Deutschland.
Introduction: Prostate cancer guidelines recommend molecular analysis of biomaterial following resistance to first-line systemic therapy in order to identify druggable mutations. We report on our results of molecular analysis of tissue specimens via next generation sequencing (NGS) in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Patients And Methods: In all, 311 mCRPC patients underwent NGS analysis from biopsy samples of progressive metastatic lesions or archival radical prostatectomy specimens.
Prospective Validation of an Automated Hybrid Multidimensional MRI Tool for Prostate Cancer Detection Using Targeted Biopsy: Comparison with PI-RADS-based Assessment.
Radiol Imaging Cancer
January 2025
From the Department of Radiology (A.C., A.N.Y., R.E., C.H., G.L., M.M., E.B.J., A.L.C., B.G., G.S.K., A.O.), Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.N.Y., M.M., A.L.C., B.G.), Department of Surgery, Section of Urology (G.G., L.F.R., P.K.M., S.E.), Department of Pathology (T.A.), and Department of Public Health Sciences (M.G.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637.
Purpose To evaluate the use of an automated hybrid multidimensional MRI (HM-MRI)-based tool to prospectively identify prostate cancer targets before MRI/US fusion biopsy in comparison with Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS)-based multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) evaluation by expert radiologists. Materials and Methods In this prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEditorial Comment on "Changes in the treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer following approval of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors: A multicenter study".
Int J Urol
January 2025
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Value of Systematic and MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy in Different Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken)
January 2025
Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background: Current approach to clinically suspicious biopsy-naïve men consists performing prostate MRI, followed by combined systematic (TRUS-Bx) and MRI-Ultrasound fusion biopsy (MRI-TBx) in those with PIRADS score ≥ 3. Researchers have attempted to determine who benefits from each biopsy method, but the results do not support the safe use of one method alone. This study aims to determine the optimal approach in biopsy-naïve men, according to their PSA levels.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!