Cosmetic and postmastectomy breast implants: Finnish women's experiences.

J Womens Health Gend Based Med

Health Services Research Unit, National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland.

Published: September 1999

The purpose of this study was to compare women's satisfaction with and short-term problems of silicone breast implants after cosmetic breast augmentation and after mastectomy. Women (n = 224) were recruited through advertising in mass media, and 91% responded to a questionnaire asking for their experiences, both positive and negative, with silicone breast implants. Approximately equal numbers of women received their implants for cosmetic reasons (augmentation group) and postmastectomy (113 and 111, respectively). Mean time from first implantation was 9 years (SD 7.3) in the cosmetic group and 8 years (SD 4.9) in the postmastectomy group. Women in the postmastectomy group received their implants at an older age than women in the cosmetic group (percent of women 45 and older, 59% and 3%, respectively). Women's overall preoperative knowledge of and postoperative satisfaction with their implants were similar in the two groups; 58% of women said that they had insufficient knowledge of breast implants preoperatively, 26% of women said they would not choose the implants again, and 44% of women expressed no dissatisfaction with their breasts. However, women in the cosmetic group were better informed about possible physical problems. One third of the women in the postmastectomy group had one or more reoperations, most frequently because of implant slippage (30%), encapsulation (26%), or implant size and shape (23%). Because insertion of breast implants is a lifelong decision, in-depth counseling about complication rates and possible risks should be given to women before implantation, and nonsurgical alternatives should be discussed, particularly for cosmetic implantation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.933DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast implants
20
cosmetic group
12
postmastectomy group
12
women
11
implants
9
silicone breast
8
implants cosmetic
8
received implants
8
women postmastectomy
8
women cosmetic
8

Similar Publications

Background: Breast prosthesis infections are challenging and traditionally managed with prosthesis removal and delayed reconstruction. Single-application negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) has shown promise for salvaging infected implants, though prior studies have been small and heterogeneous. This study analyzes outcomes and compares protocols from four institutions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reconstructive techniques for chest and breast deformities in Poland syndrome: An up-to-date systematic review.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

December 2024

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Background: Poland syndrome (PS) is a congenital abnormality defined as aplasia or hypoplasia of the unilateral pectoralis muscle and breast tissue that may be accompanied by limb or thoracic deformities. Reconstruction of deformities associated with PS is challenging owing to the spectrum of differences. We aimed to evaluate the trends in surgical management of chest and breast anatomical anomalies associated with PS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Breast ultrasound has been established for many years as an important method in addition to mammography for clarifying breast findings. The goal of the Best Practice Guidelines Part III of the DEGUM breast ultrasound working group is to provide colleagues working in senology with information regarding the specific medical indications for breast ultrasound in addition to the current ultrasound criteria and assessment categories published in part I and the additional and optional sonographic diagnostic methods described in part II. The value of breast ultrasound for specific indications including follow-up, evaluation of breast implants, diagnostic workup of dense breast tissue, diagnostic workup during pregnancy and lactation, and the diagnostic workup of breast findings in men is discussed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Breast ultrasound has been established for many years as an important method in addition to mammography for clarifying breast findings. The goal of the Best Practice Guidelines Part III of the DEGUM breast ultrasound working group is to provide colleagues working in senology with information regarding the specific medical indications for breast ultrasound in addition to the current ultrasound criteria and assessment categories published in part I and the additional and optional sonographic diagnostic methods described in part II. The value of breast ultrasound for specific indications including follow-up, evaluation of breast implants, diagnostic workup of dense breast tissue, diagnostic workup during pregnancy and lactation, and the diagnostic workup of breast findings in men is discussed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!