Atypical immature metaplastic-like proliferations of the cervix: diagnostic reproducibility and viral (HPV) correlates.

Although some immature squamous lesions (papillary immature metaplasias) of the cervix have been described and associated with human papillomaviruses (HPV), nonpapillary atypical immature squamous proliferations (AISPs) are a poorly defined entity and range from atypical reactive metaplasias to squamous intraepithelial lesions resembling immature metaplasia. This study examined the diagnostic reproducibility of AISPs and their relationship to HPV nucleic acids. Forty-four diagnostically problematic AISPs were studied. Based on nuclear density (crowding), chromasia, variation (anisokaryosis) in nuclear size, and surface cytoplasmic maturation, cases were independently scored by 2 observers as (1) probably reactive (Rx), (2) not otherwise specified (NOS), and (3) squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL). Extracted archival DNA was scored for HPV by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis. Interobserver reproducibility (kappa statistic) and HPV correlates (chi square) were computed. Approximately one third of cases were classified in each category by the observers. Interobserver reproducibility was excellent (0.80), poor (0.23), and fair to good (0.41) for a diagnosis of Rx, NOS, and SIL, respectively. Differences in HPV DNA positivity between Rx and SIL were significant for both observers (5.8% to 6.7% v 38.4% to 50.0%, respectively); however, differences between NOS and SIL (30.7% to 42.8% v 38.4% to 50.0%) were not, even when cases were limited to those in which both observers agreed (28.6% v 37.5%). By light microscopy, AISPs exceeding the threshold for presumed reactive changes (NOS or SIL) are a morphologically heterogeneous group that defy precise classification. Furthermore, their histopathologic appearance, even when there is diagnostic agreement, does not consistently correlate with their HPV status. The laboratory management of AISPs should take into account the uncertainty of this diagnosis.