Wounds made by the Endopath nonbladed obturator, the Step trocar, and conventional pyramidal tip trocars were compared. The endopath nonbladed obturator and the Step trocar made wounds by separating tissue fibers, whereas the pyramidal tip trocar cut tissue fibers. The wounds of the Endopath nonbladed obturator and the Step trocar were similar in length but were narrower than wounds made by the pyramidal tip trocar. Further studies are needed to determine whether the wounds made by the Endopath nonbladed obturator and the Step trocar will have fewer complications than conventional pyramidal tip trocars.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.1999.9.455 | DOI Listing |
Surg Endosc
May 2009
Center for Visceral Biomechanics and Pain, Aalborg Hospital Science and Innovation Center, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark,
Background: This study aimed to investigate wound geometry and tissue damage caused by several different trocar types using a quantitative functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) geometric profile and histomorphologic analysis.
Methods: Four pigs were used in this study. After general anesthesia, six different trocars were randomly inserted at preselected locations in the porcine abdominal wall.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
October 1999
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, USA.
Wounds made by the Endopath nonbladed obturator, the Step trocar, and conventional pyramidal tip trocars were compared. The endopath nonbladed obturator and the Step trocar made wounds by separating tissue fibers, whereas the pyramidal tip trocar cut tissue fibers. The wounds of the Endopath nonbladed obturator and the Step trocar were similar in length but were narrower than wounds made by the pyramidal tip trocar.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!