An automated turbidimetric system, Bioscreen C, was used to monitor growth of ten strains of Listeria monocytogenes at different temperatures. Several methods for estimation of maximum specific growth rate (mu(max)) and lag time (lag) from turbidimetric data were compared to values estimated from viable count data. By using a calibration factor, reliable estimations of mu(max) could be obtained from turbidimetric measurements. On the other hand, accurate estimations of lag required some viable count data.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7012(99)00089-5 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!