Modeling activation and desensitization of G-protein coupled receptors provides insight into ligand efficacy.

J Theor Biol

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, 3074 H.H. Dow, 2300 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2136, USA.

Published: September 1999

Signaling through G-protein coupled receptors is one of the most prevalent and important methods of transmitting information to the inside of cells. Many mathematical models have been proposed to describe this type of signal transduction, and the ternary complex (ligand/receptor/G-protein) model and its derivatives are among the most widely accepted. Current versions of these equilibrium models include both active (i.e. signaling) and inactive conformations of the receptor, but do not include the dynamics of G-protein activation or receptor desensitization. Yet understanding how these dynamic events effect response behavior is crucial to determining ligand efficacy. We developed a mathematical model for G-protein coupled receptor signaling that includes G-protein activation and receptor desensitization, and used it to predict how activation and desensitization would change if either the conformational selectivity (the effect of ligand binding on the distribution of active and inactive receptor states) or the desensitization rate constant was ligand-specific. In addition, the model was used to explore the implications of measuring responses far downstream from G-protein activation. By comparing the experimental data from the beta(2)-adrenergic, micro-opioid, D(1)dopamine, and neutrophil N -formyl peptide receptors with the predictions of our model, we found that the conformational selectivity is the predominant factor in determining the amounts of activation and desensitization caused by a particular ligand.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1999.0988DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

activation desensitization
12
g-protein coupled
12
g-protein activation
12
coupled receptors
8
ligand efficacy
8
activation receptor
8
receptor desensitization
8
conformational selectivity
8
desensitization
6
g-protein
6

Similar Publications

Muscarinic cannabinoid suppression of excitation, a novel form of coincidence detection.

Pharmacol Res

January 2025

Gill Institute for Neuroscience; Dept. of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405. Electronic address:

Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the chief psychoactive ingredient of cannabis, acts in the brain primarily via cannabinoid CB1 receptors. These receptors are implicated in several forms of synaptic plasticity - depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE), metabotropic suppression of excitation (MSE), long term depression (LTD) and activation-dependent desensitization. Cultured autaptic hippocampal neurons express all of these, illustrating the rich functional and temporal heterogeneity of CB1 at a single set of synapses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Control of striatal circuit development by the chromatin regulator .

Sci Adv

January 2025

Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

The pathophysiology of neurodevelopmental disorders involves vulnerable neural populations, including striatal circuitry, and convergent molecular nodes, including chromatin regulation and synapse function. Despite this, how epigenetic regulation regulates striatal development is understudied. Recurrent de novo mutations in are associated with intellectual disability and autism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Trauma-focused psychotherapy is treatment of choice for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, about half of patients do not respond. Recently, there is increased interest in brain criticality, which assesses the phase transition between order and disorder in brain activity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of home-use desensitizing agents over an 8-week period by comparing them using different measurement methods.

Methods: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted with 180 individuals aged between 18 and 70 who clinically diagnosed dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in two or more non-adjacent teeth. Subjects who met the inclusion criteria (n = 164) were randomly allocated into five test groups-using Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), Arginine, Novamin, Propolis, and Potassium nitrate-and a control group using standard fluoride toothpaste.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!