Is diagnostic arthroscopy of the hip worthwhile? A prospective review of 328 adults investigated for hip pain.

J Bone Joint Surg Br

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.

Published: July 1999

We describe a prospective study of 328 patients undergoing arthroscopy of the hip. Arthrography, CT or MRI was performed when clinically indicated. A preoperative diagnosis was reached in 174 patients (53%), while the remaining 154 were diagnosed as having 'idiopathic hip pain'. In seven patients, access to the hip was inadequate. Arthroscopy altered the diagnosis in 176 hips (53%). The new primary diagnoses were osteoarthritis (75 patients), osteochondral defects (34), torn labra (23), synovitis (11) and loose bodies (9). In 172 hips (52%) an operative procedure was undertaken. In the remaining 84 patients (26%), arthroscopy neither changed the diagnosis nor provided surgical treatment. Arthroscopy of the hip is considered to be of value in assessing and treating the adult patient with pain in the hip of uncertain cause.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b4.8803DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

arthroscopy hip
12
hip
7
patients
5
diagnostic arthroscopy
4
hip worthwhile?
4
worthwhile? prospective
4
prospective review
4
review 328
4
328 adults
4
adults investigated
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!