Background: Patient infection from contaminated gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes can generally be attributed to failure to follow appropriate reprocessing guidelines. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration recommended a 45-minute exposure of GI endoscopes to 2.4% glutaraldehyde solutions heated to 25 degrees C. Simultaneously, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates endorsed a reprocessing guideline that emphasized manual precleaning and recommended a 20-minute exposure to a 2.4% glutaraldehyde solution at room temperature. Since then, little information has become available regarding actual reprocessing practices in the United States.
Methods: A previously developed questionnaire regarding endoscopic disinfection practices was mailed to randomly selected members of the ASGE.
Results: The survey was sent to 730 members and 294 responded (40.3%). Appropriate manual cleaning (suctioning detergent through the accessory channel and brushing the channel and valves) is performed by 90.7% of respondents; 69.9% then use automated reprocessors for disinfection or sterilization. Glutaraldehyde is the most widely used chemical disinfectant; 85.3% use glutaraldehyde as one of their primary disinfectants. The most commonly used disinfection time with 2.4% glutaraldehyde is 20 minutes (83.9%) followed by 45 minutes (11.4%). Only 23.8% of users of 2.4% glutaraldehyde heat their solution; 59.6% of centers test disinfectant concentration daily or more frequently; 74.0% sterilize nondisposable forceps before use; 29.2% of centers re-use disposable endoscopic accessories (which are more frequently disinfected rather than sterilized). Twelve respondents reported cases of endoscopic cross infection.
Conclusions: A significant minority of endoscopy centers still do not completely conform to recent ASGE, American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates guidelines on disinfection, and they may not be appropriately disinfecting GI endoscopes. Rigid adherence to recommended guidelines is strongly encouraged to ensure patient safety.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/ge.1999.v50.99615 | DOI Listing |
Food Chem X
January 2025
Xingzhi College, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321100, China.
Developing a robust and safe carrier for enzyme immobilization is crucial for their application in the food processing industry. In this study, a novel crosslinked chitosan microspheres (CSMs) were prepared using glutaraldehyde (GA) as the crosslinking agent, using a newly developed emulsification-neutralization combined method. Nuclease P1 (NP1) was immobilized onto these microspheres, the maximum activity of NP1@CSMs-GA reach to 53,859.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMolecules
December 2024
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, I. Lučića 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
In this study, poly(vinyl-alcohol) (PVA)/chitosan (CS) polymer blend films with different amounts of CS (0, 5, 20 and 35 wt. %) crosslinked by glutaraldehyde (GA) were prepared. The structure and properties of the prepared polymer films were studied by means of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and the time-lag permeation technique.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMacromol Biosci
December 2024
Biomanufacturing Technology, Bioprocessing Technology Institute (BTI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 138669, Singapore.
Third-degree burns result in extensive damage to the skin's epidermal and dermal layers, with limited treatment options available. Currently, xenogeneic collagen-based skin grafts are used as scaffolds to integrate into the wound bed and provide a template for neodermis formation. Existing commercial products like Integra dermal templates rely on a time-consuming and variable dehydrothermal (DHT) crosslinking process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBraz Dent J
December 2024
Department of Restorative Dentistry. Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Brazil.
This study investigated the effects of nonthermal atmospheric pressure plasma (NAPP) application and dentin rehydration with water (REHY) on bond strength (BS) of adhesives. Three etch-and-rinse adhesives were tested: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBM / water-based primer + adhesive resin), Gluma Bond Universal (GBU / single-bottle containing acetone as organic solvent) and Prime&Bond Universal (PBU / single-bottle containing propanol as organic solvent). Adhesives were applied: 1- to phosphoric acid-etched dentin (Control), 2- after NAPP application for 45 seconds to etched dentin or 3- after REHY with water (10 seconds) of plasma-treated etched dentin.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
December 2024
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal.
Restorative treatment is the most common approach to treating dental caries. However, after cavity preparation, some microorganisms may still persist in the substrate, suggesting the use of cavity disinfectants. Nevertheless, their effect on adhesion to composite resins is not yet fully understood, especially in primary teeth.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!