Objective: PONV is a frequent postoperative complication. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of oral dolasetron in comparison to intravenous droperidol (DHB) and to a combination of both drugs for prophylaxis of PONV.
Methods: 80 patients (ASA I-III) were randomly allocated to one of four groups and received the following medication: group A: 50 mg dolasetron was given orally 45-60 minutes before anaesthesia was induced, group B: 2.5 mg i.v. DHB + placebo p.o. was administered while inducing anaesthesia (positive control group), group C: 50 mg dolasetron was given 45-60 minutes before anaesthesia was induced and 2.5 mg i.v. DHB was given while inducing anaesthesia, group D: placebo tablet was administered 45-60 minutes before anaesthesia was induced (negative control group). PONV was assessed using a 5-point score: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = nausea, 2 = retching, 3 = vomiting, 4 = multiple vomiting. Metoclopramid was given as antiemetic if a patient reached two or more score points.
Results: PONV scores were significantly lower in group A and C (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Patients treated with DHB showed a significantly lower PONV score in comparison to the placebo treated patients (p < 0.05). Between the groups A, B and C we found no significantly different PONV scores. Postoperative consumption of metoclopramid was significantly lower in the groups A (2.4 +/- 5.2 mg) and C (1.0 +/- 3.1 mg) than in the placebo group (6.0 +/- 6.8 mg), whereas between group B (3.0 +/- 5.7 mg) and D we found no significant differences.
Conclusions: Single dose of oral dolasetron and single dose of intravenous DHB reduced PONV effectively, in patients undergoing gynaecologic surgery. A combination of dolasetron and DHB has no better effect than a single dose of oral dolasetron. Contrary to DHB the application of dolasetron decreased the postoperative antiemetic requirement significantly.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-1999-9974 | DOI Listing |
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods
January 2019
iCardiac Technologies, Inc., Rochester, NY, USA; Heart Research Follow-up Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Introduction: This paper is based on a presentation held at the Annual Safety Pharmacology Society meeting in September 2017, at which challenges for the clinical component of CiPA were presented. FDA has published an automated algorithm for measurement of the J-Tpeak interval on a median beat from a vector magnitude lead derived from a 12-lead ECG. CiPA proposes that J-Tpeak prolongation < 10 ms can be used for drugs with a QTc effect < 20 ms to differentiate between safe and unsafe delayed repolarization and to reduce the level of ECG monitoring in late stage clinical trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOncologist
April 2016
Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Background: Standard prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with highly emetogenic and anthracycline-cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy includes a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA), and corticosteroid therapy. NEPA is a fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron. The primary objective of this analysis was to document the safety profile, including cardiac safety, of NEPA + dexamethasone in comparison with current therapies across all phase II/III trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Vet Res
June 2015
California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory System, Davis, CA, USA.
Background: Dietary supplement use in both human and animals to augment overall health continues to increase and represents a potential health risk due to the lack of safety regulations imposed on the manufacturers. Because there are no requirements for demonstrating safety and efficacy prior to marketing, dietary supplements may contain potentially toxic contaminants such as hepatotoxic microcystins produced by several species of blue-green algae.
Case Presentation: An 11-year-old female spayed 8.
AAPS PharmSciTech
June 2014
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, USA.
It has been advocated that biopharmaceutic risk assessment should be conducted early in pediatric product development and synchronized with the adult product development program. However, we are unaware of efforts to classify drugs into a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) framework for pediatric patients. The objective was to classify five drugs into a potential BCS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!