A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[White coat and non-dipper hypertension in patients recently diagnosed with mild hypertension]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) among patients diagnosed with light hypertension, focusing on their demographics and cardiovascular risk factors.
  • Out of 238 patients, 39.5% were found to have WCH, with a higher occurrence in women and those with isolated systolic hypertension.
  • The findings suggest that WCH is prevalent in this population, indicating that primary care monitoring could be beneficial, while the similarities in profiles between WCH and sustained hypertension might stem from the recent nature of their hypertension diagnosis.

Article Abstract

Objective: To calculate the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) in patients recently diagnosed with light hypertension. To compare their demographic features, cardiovascular risk factors, and the level of early organic effect of WCH versus sustained hypertension, and dippers versus non-dippers.

Design: Descriptive, crossover study.

Setting: Five urban health centres.

Patients: 238 people between 18 and 65 were chosen. After screening, they were diagnosed with light (1993 WHO criteria) or essential hypertension.

Measurements And Main Results: Patients received: 24-hour out-patient control of blood pressure (BP), analysis, back of eye and electrocardiogram. WCH was defined as mean daily BP < 139/88 mmHg and mean night-time BP < 123/74 mmHg. Non-dippers were those patients whose mean night-time BP went down from the daytime BP by less than 10%. 39.5% had WCH (33.3-45.7). This was associated with women (49.5%), with lower casual systolic and diastolic BP and with isolated systolic hypertension, p < 0.05. Risk of WCH was 2.14 times greater in women (95% CI, 1.24-3.70). There were no significant differences in the cardiovascular risk or morbidity profile between WCH and sustained HT, or between dippers and non-dippers.

Conclusions: WCH is common in patients recently diagnosed with both light and essential hypertension. This makes us think that the use of primary care out-patient monitoring of BP could be efficient in this type of patient. The absence of significant differences between WCH and sustained hypertension, or between dippers and non-dippers, may be due to their hypertension being recent.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients diagnosed
12
diagnosed light
12
hypertension
8
wch
8
cardiovascular risk
8
sustained hypertension
8
hypertension dippers
8
wch sustained
8
patients
5
[white coat
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!