A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Coordinate alterations in the expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, p300, and Rad51 in response to genotoxic and other stresses in human prostate cancer cells. | LitMetric

Background: BRCA1 and BRCA2 participate in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and DNA repair pathways. The latter role may be mediated by interaction with DNA recombinase Rad51. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of genotoxic and other cytotoxic agents on expression of DNA damage-response genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, p300, and Rad51) in human prostate cancer cells.

Methods: Subconfluent proliferating cultures of Tsu-Prl or DU-145 cells were treated with various stressful agents and assayed 24 hr later for alterations in: 1) mRNA expression (by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR); 2) cell viability (by trypan blue dye exclusion); and 3) protein expression (by Western blotting).

Results: Of 26 agents screened, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA reductions were observed in both cell lines after exposure to adriamycin (ADR), camptothecin (CPT), sodium selenite (SLN), and ultraviolet radiation (UV), while nitrogen mustard (HN2) caused mRNA reduction in DU-145 but not in Tsu-Prl. Inhibition of BRCA1/2 expression by ADR and HN2 was blocked by cycloheximide, suggesting that this requires new protein synthesis, while inhibition by CPT, SLN, and UV did not require protein synthesis. Reduction of p300 and Rad51 mRNA levels occurred in parallel with that of BRCA1/2, suggesting coordinate regulation of these genes. The ability of an agent to inhibit mRNA expression was not directly correlated with cytotoxicity. ADR, CPT, UV, and SLN also caused reduction of protein levels; but the kinetics of decreases in protein vs. mRNA differed. After ADR treatment, high molecular weight (Mr hyperphosphorylated) BRCA1 decreased more rapidly than the low Mr species. BRCA2 showed a more rapid decrease in protein than mRNA, while Rad51 showed the opposite. By 48 and 72 hr post-ADR, all four mRNAs and proteins were reduced to well below control levels, except for Rad51 protein, which was only moderately decreased.

Conclusions: Selected DNA-damaging agents (ADR, CPT, and UV) and a reducing agent (SLN) inhibited BRCA1/2, p300, and Rad51 expression in prostate cancer cells, although decreases in mRNA vs. protein did not coincide. We postulate that temporal changes in relative protein levels affect different phases of the stress response, and that the ultimate downregulation of all four genes promotes prostate cancer survival.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19990615)40:1<37::aid-pros5>3.0.co;2-pDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brca1 brca2
16
p300 rad51
16
prostate cancer
16
protein
9
brca2 p300
8
human prostate
8
cancer cells
8
mrna
8
mrna expression
8
protein synthesis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!