A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Are anatomic landmarks reliable in determination of fusion level in posterolateral lumbar fusion? | LitMetric

Study Design: Determination of the fusion level by direct observation and palpation of anatomic landmarks is compared with the finding obtained from a lateral intraoperative radiograph.

Objectives: To assess the reliability of the use of intraoperative anatomic landmarks in determination of the fusion level.

Summary Of Background Data: Accurate determination of the level to be fused in noninstrumented posterolateral fusion is crucial. No studies are available in which the value of direct observation and palpation of the anatomic landmarks in determination of the fusion level has been assessed.

Methods: Eighty patients who underwent posterolateral fusion without instrumentation in the lumbosacral spine were included in this study. During surgery, first, the cephalad transverse process at the desired level to be fused was determined by direct observation and palpation of the anatomic landmarks; second, a metal mark was placed beneath the cephalad transverse process at the level determined by anatomic landmarks. This was followed by a lateral radiograph. The consistency and discrepancy between the use of the anatomic landmarks and lateral radiography in determining the desired fusion level were recorded.

Results: The fusion level determined by direct observation and palpation of the anatomic landmarks was accurate in 76 (95%) cases. In the remaining four cases, intraoperative x-rays determined that the selection of the cephalad transverse process for fusion was one level too high in three cases and one level too low in the other case. All errors in determination of the level to be fused occurred in patients who had extensive laminectomy at L4-S1.

Conclusions: Determination of fusion level by direct observation and palpation of the anatomic landmarks is not reliable in patients who have had or require decompressive procedures. A lateral radiograph should be routinely obtained for accurate identification of the level to be fused.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199905150-00008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anatomic landmarks
36
fusion level
28
determination fusion
20
direct observation
20
observation palpation
20
palpation anatomic
20
level fused
16
level
13
cephalad transverse
12
transverse process
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!