Background: The aim of the study was to compare the success/failure rate and complications of insertion into the umbilical vein, of either double-lumen catheters (Charrière diameter 04, length 13 and 30 cm) or single-lumen catheters (Charrière diameter 05, length 40 cm) in a population of neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. The numbers of insertions of additional peripheral venous catheters were also compared.
Patients And Methods: The population was divided into two groups according to the severity of the respiratory failure. Group 1 (n = 52): normal hemodynamic parameters and moderate respiratory failure (FiO2 < 0.6): only single-lumen catheters were used. Group 2 (n = 56): low systemic pressure requiring vascular filling and/or inotropic drugs infusion and/or severe respiratory failure (FiO2 > 0.6): in this group, either single-lumen catheters or double-lumen catheters were inserted.
Results: The success rate of insertion of double-lumen catheters and of single-lumen catheters were similar (61% vs 71%: P = 0.7). Nineteen double-lumen catheters were inserted in the group 2. The average duration of double-lumen umbilical catheterization was not significantly different from simple-lumen catheterization (4.9 +/- 2.2 vs 4.6 +/- 2.2 days). Complications relating to the umbilical venous catheterization were uncommon: three catheter obstructions (two with single-lumen catheter, one with double-lumen catheters), two nosocomial infections (both with single-lumen catheter), one hydropericardium (with single-lumen catheter). In group 2, more peripheral venous catheters were required during the first 72 hours of life after insertion of single-lumen catheter than after insertion of double-lumen catheters (average number of peripheral venous catheters per infant: 1.6 +/- 0.83 vs 1 +/- 0.35 respectively; P < 0.01).
Conclusion: Feasibility and complication rate of umbilical double-lumen catheters were similar to those of single-lumen catheters. The use of umbilical double-lumen catheters reduces the need of peripheral venous catheters.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0929-693x(99)80219-x | DOI Listing |
BMJ Open
December 2024
Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Background: Non-invasive ventilation combined with pulmonary surfactant (PS) therapy is recognised as a method for treating neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). Among the administration, methods of PS, INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation (InSurE) and less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) have been widely discussed.LISA technique prevents patients from exposure to invasive positive pressure ventilation (PPV), thus improving the long-term outcomes of the respiratory system, but it faces challenges in resource-limited areas due to complexity and cost.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransfusion
January 2025
Faculty of Medical Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Objective: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a vital therapeutic modality in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) for various indications. Traditionally, pediatric TPE is performed via a large bore, double lumen catheter, whose insertion necessitates deep sedation, and poses risk of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Building on our previous success utilizing percutaneous radial artery catheters (ALs) for apheresis procedures, we present our experience with ALs for TPE procedures in the PICU.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrologiia
November 2024
Nephrology department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Purpose: In this study, we compared the effects of a single patient dialysis fluid delivery system (SPDDS) against a continuous dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS) on inflammatory markers and endotoxemia in a population of patients receiving routine hemodialysis (HD) at Ain Shams University.
Materials And Methods: Eighty prevalent HD patients, ages 18 to 60, who were clinically stable and receiving thrice weekly dialysis treatments via an arteriovenous fistula were the subjects of a cross-sectional research. The study excluded patients with double lumen venous catheters used for hemodialysis, acute infections, cancer, and chronic liver disease.
J Med Case Rep
November 2024
Interventional Radiology, Radiology Department, University of São Paulo, Rua Rafael Rinaldi, 365, apto 603, Uberlândia, São Paulo, 38400-384, Brazil.
Background: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical benefit of double-lumen port catheters in patients receiving chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition concurrently or in those with vascular access failure. The advantages, complications, indications and duration of use of double port-a-cath were considered.
Methods: Thirteen Brazilian patients received a double-lumen port catheter that was implanted under ultrasonographic and fluoroscopic guidance in the radiologic interventional suite.
Gut Microbes
November 2024
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!