Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: Surgical specialists have generally underutilized telemedicine technologies. This report describes the use of real-time interactive-video telemedicine to augment the care of vascular surgical patients in underserved rural areas within our region.
Materials And Methods: The telemedicine system at Fletcher-Allen Health Care (FAHC) and the University of Vermont in Burlington utilizes desktop video conferencing technology with terrestrial transmission at 384 kbps. The current system was initiated in January 1996, and there are at present 18 external sites and multiple locations at FAHC, including the vascular laboratory, angiography suites, operating rooms, and the home of one vascular surgeon. During the first 12 months of operation, the vascular surgeons were asked to complete a questionnaire to evaluate the technology and its usefulness in clinical care. The use of the telemedicine system by the vascular surgeons was monitored by the questionnaires, phone bills, and a special "no charge" billing code. Telemedicine events were classified as clinical or educational.
Results: In the 26 months since implementation, 107 events have taken place, including both clinical and educational uses. There were 103 clinical uses by three vascular surgeons, including five emergency uses. A joint Vermont-Maine vascular educational conference has taken place four times. Overall, use by vascular surgery represented 14.2% of all telemedicine events in the first year or 30.9% of all clinical events during that time period. Use of telemedicine was reported to have improved patient care in 96% of the cases. Eighty percent of the telemedicine uses in the first year saved patient travel. There were no diagnostic errors, as determined by in-person clinical follow-up, attributable to the telemedicine system use.
Conclusions: Use of a real-time video telemedicine has great potential for vascular surgeons, but cost-effectiveness studies may be needed prior to its widespread adoption.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.279 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!