Background: Cyclosporin A (CsA) has been shown to be highly effective in the therapy of atopic dermatitis (AD). However, little information exists on the treatment of AD patients with Sandimmun Neoral(R) (Neoral), a microemulsion of CsA with improved pharmacokinetic properties in comparison to Sandimmun(R).

Objective: We have compared the efficacy and tolerability of Sandimmun and Neoral.

Methods: In a randomised, monocentric, double-blind, cross-over pilot study (n = 14), each formulation was administered for 8 weeks, followed by switching to the other treatment group for another 8 weeks.

Results: After 2 weeks of therapy, the improvement under Neoral therapy was significantly higher than with Sandimmun (disease activity p = 0.047; extent of disease p = 0.016). In contrast, after 8 weeks of therapy, both formulations yielded similar improvement in the patients' condition.

Conclusion: While both formulations are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of severe AD, Neoral may have a faster onset of action and higher initial efficacy, which makes it an adequate replacement for Sandimmun.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000018065DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment severe
8
atopic dermatitis
8
cross-over pilot
8
pilot study
8
weeks therapy
8
comparison formulations
4
formulations cyclosporin
4
treatment
4
cyclosporin treatment
4
severe atopic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!