SPECT versus planar 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial scintigraphy: comparison of accuracy and impact on patient management in chronic ischemic heart disease.

A head-to-head comparison between 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT and planar myocardial imaging using dipyridamole low-level exercise stress was performed for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) and for the impact on patient management in 78 patients (pts) who underwent coronary arteriography. Overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of CAD were 82% and 82% for SPECT, and 78% and 73% for planar imaging, respectively (both NS). Compared to planar imaging the sensitivity of SPECT imaging was significantly higher for detecting left anterior descending (p = 0.