Aims: There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the benefit of flash glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This individual patient data meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of commencing flash glucose monitoring on HbA1c in people living with T2DM treated with insulin in a real-world setting.
Methods: A meta-analysis of eight observational studies which assessed change in HbA1c at 3-6 months following initiating flash glucose monitoring for which Abbott Diabetes Care could provide individual patient data was performed.
Introduction: Real-world evidence (RWE) confirms that reductions in HbA1c for children and adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are associated with use of the FreeStyle Libre system. This current meta-analysis aims to investigate whether HbA1c benefits are sustained over 24 months and to identify patterns of change in HbA1c for users of the FreeStyle Libre system for people living with T1DM or T2DM.
Methods: A bibliographic search up to December 2020 identified 75 studies reporting data on change in lab HbA1c in 30,478 participants with type 1 (n = 28,063; 62 trials) or type 2 diabetes (n = 2415; 13 trials) using the FreeStyle Libre system, including observations on children, adolescents and adults.
Introduction: Glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is the established standard measurement for assessment of glycaemic control in people with diabetes. Here we report on a meta-analysis of real-world observational studies on the impact of flash continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control as measured by HbA1c.
Methods: A total of 271 studies were identified in our search, of which 29 contained data reporting changes in HbA1c over periods from 1 to 24 months that could be used in a statistical analysis.
Diabetes Technol Ther
January 2011
Background: a new strip, designed to enhance the ease of use and minimize interference of non-glucose sugars, has been developed to replace the current FreeStyle (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) blood glucose test strip. We evaluated the performance of this new strip.
Methods: laboratory evaluation included precision, linearity, dynamic range, effects of operating temperature, humidity, altitude, hematocrit, interferents, and blood reapplication.
The use of no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) as a way of interpreting toxicology studies carries a number of problems, and the benchmark dose (BMD), or its lower confidence limit have been proposed as potential replacements. In practice, the theoretical advantages of the BMD approach are often outweighed by the practical disadvantages posed in a regulatory context. Attempts to seek consensus for the routine use of BMD methodology tend to involve diluting its potential advantages as much as they address the disadvantages, resulting in a relatively complex interpolation tool that delivers little more than the NOAEL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF