Publications by authors named "Zachary B Kagan"

To explore why clinical 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz SCS) might improve neurological function in a model of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), the short-term behavioral, electrophysiological, and histological effects of 10 kHz SCS were studied using adult male streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats. Four testing groups were established: Naïve controls (N = 8), STZ controls (N = 7), STZ+Sham SCS (N = 9), and STZ+10 kHz SCS (N = 11). After intraperitoneal injection (60 mg/kg) of STZ caused the rats to become hyperglycemic, SCS electrodes were implanted in the dorsal epidural space over the L5-L6 spinal segments in the STZ+Sham SCS and STZ+10 kHz SCS groups and were stimulated for 14 days.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Kilohertz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (kHF-SCS) is a rapidly advancing neuromodulatory technique in the clinical management of chronic pain. However, the precise cellular mechanisms underlying kHF-SCS-induced paresthesia-free pain relief, as well as the neural responses within spinal pain circuits, remain largely unexplored. In this study, using a novel preparation, we investigated the impact of varying kilohertz frequency SCS on dorsal horn neuron activation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) can result in the loss of protective sensation, in which people are at twice the likelihood of foot ulceration and three times the risk of lower extremity amputation. Here, we evaluated the long-term effects of high-frequency (10 kHz) paresthesia-independent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on protective sensation in the feet and the associated risk of foot ulceration for individuals with PDN.

Methods: The SENZA-PDN clinical study was a randomized, controlled trial in which 216 participants with PDN were randomized to receive either conventional medical management (CMM) alone or 10 kHz SCS plus CMM, with optional treatment crossover after 6 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Since 1967, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used to manage chronic intractable pain of the trunk and limbs. Low-intensity, paresthesia-free, 10 kHz SCS has demonstrated statistically- and clinically-superior long-term pain relief compared to conventional SCS. 10 kHz SCS has been proposed to operate via selective activation of inhibitory interneurons in the superficial dorsal horn.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low-intensity 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to provide pain relief in patients with chronic pain resulting from diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). However to date, there have been no studies of 10 kHz SCS in animal models of diabetes. We aimed to establish correlative data of the effects of this therapy on behavioral and electrophysiological measures in a DPN model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

New strategies for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic pain have emerged in recent years, which may work better via different analgesic mechanisms than traditional low-frequency (e.g., 50 Hz) paresthesia-based SCS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current truncating circuit designs used in some controllable pulse width transcranial magnetic stimulation systems can be adapted for use with the peripheral nervous system. Such a scaled-down stimulator produces neuromuscular activation using less stimulus energy than described in previous reports of sciatic nerve stimulation. To evaluate the energy reductions possible with current truncation, we performed six in vivo experiments in rats where the magnetic stimulating coil abutted the sciatic nerve.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Signals recorded from the peripheral nervous system (PNS) with high channel count penetrating microelectrode arrays, such as the Utah Slanted Electrode Array (USEA), often have electromyographic (EMG) signals contaminating the neural signal. This common-mode signal source may prevent single neural units from successfully being detected, thus hindering motor decode algorithms. Reducing this EMG contamination may lead to more accurate motor decode performance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Previous reports of magnetic stimulation of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) used various coil geometries, all with outer diameters larger than 35 mm, and stimulation energies in the 50 J range to evoke neural excitation. Recent reports of central nervous system (CNS) activation used sub-mm-scale solenoid coils with mJ energy levels. The goal of this study was to translate the lower energy levels from the CNS to the PNS via using smaller coils placed in closer proximity to the neural tissue.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There has been recurring interest in using magnetic neural stimulation for implantable localized stimulation. However, the large stimulation voltages and energies necessary to evoke neuronal activity have tempered this interest. To investigate the potential of magnetic stimulation as a viable methodology and to provide the ability to investigate novel coil designs that can result in lower stimulation threshold voltages and energies, there is a need for a model that accurately predicts the magnetic field-tissue interaction that results in neuronal stimulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Efficacy of magnetic stimulation of the central or peripheral nervous system depends on the spatial and temporal distribution of the induced electric field generated by the magnetic coil. Therefore, accurate estimation of the induced electric field is crucial to the design and optimization of magnetic coils, particularly as the coil dimensions are reduced. In this work, we developed a numerical model of a multifascicular sciatic nerve to study the effect of tissue heterogeneity on the induced electric field.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Functional electrical stimulation is the current gold standard for stimulating neuronal interfaces for functional neuromuscular and cortical applications, but it is not without its drawbacks. One such fault is the need to have direct electrical contact with the nerve tissue, and any side effects this causes. Functional magnetic stimulation, which works though electromagnetic induction, does not require electrical contact and may be a viable alternative to functional electrical stimulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF