Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy: Issues, Contradictions and Search for Effective Diagnostic Criteria. Literature Review. Part 2.

Active research of noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NCM) has been going on for more than 30 years. A significant amount of information has been accumulated that is familiar to a much larger number of specialists than in the most recent past. Despite this, numerous issues remain unresolved, ranging from classification (congenital or acquired, nosology, or morphological phenotype) to the ongoing search for clear diagnostic criteria that separate NCM from physiological hypertrabecularity and secondary noncompaction myocardium with the background of existing chronic processes.

Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy: Issues, Contradictions, and Search for Effective Diagnostic Criteria. Literature Review. Part 1.

Active research of noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NCM) has been going on for more than 30 years. A significant amount of information has been accumulated that is familiar to a much larger number of specialists than in the most recent past. Despite this, numerous issues remain unresolved, ranging from classification (congenital or acquired, nosology or morphological phenotype) to the ongoing search for clear diagnostic criteria that separate NCM from physiological hypertrabecularity and secondary noncompaction myocardium with the background of existing chronic processes.

Distal Radial Access: Is There a Clinical Benefit?

For decades, the femoral artery has been the most common vascular access for diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures. However, over the past 20 years, radial access has been gaining popularity, as it is a safer and allows practical access with more benefits. Recently, the new distal radial access has proven to be an equal or perhaps even safer vascular access for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary and noncoronary interventions.

A narrative review of history, advantages, future developments of the distal radial access.

This article presents a historical excursus and a review of modern literature on distal radial access for interventional surgery, discussing the anatomical and physiological substantiation of the use of this access point in endovascular surgery, its advantages and disadvantages. The main considerations directly related to distal puncture, choice of instrumentation, hemostasis, possible complications, and prevention are analyzed. The major areas of interventional surgery (coronary, vascular, oncological, and neurointerventional), where the distal radial approach is actively used, are reflected and their characteristics are highlighted.

Distal Radial Artery Access in Noncoronary Procedures.

Since the beginning of interventional cardiology and for decades, the femoral artery has been the access of choice for both diagnostic and interventional endovascular procedures. Due to an extensive evidence base accumulated over the last 20 years, the majority of interventional cardiologists around the world prefer classical radial artery access for both elective and emergency procedures. A similar trend has been observed for distal radial artery access over the last 5 years.