The three objectives of this study were (i) to explore the effect of various levels of aberrations on subjective vision by scoring images, (ii) to compare subjective scores obtained with real optics and simulated images and (iii) to test the ability of image quality metrics to predict these scores. In a first experiment, 14 subjects evaluated the quality of images degraded by 0.05, 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To compare the effect of primary spherical aberration and vertical coma on depth of focus measured with 2 methods.
Setting: Laboratoire Aimé Cotton, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, and Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.
Design: Evaluation of technology.
We optimize the subjective depth of focus (DoF) with combinations of spherical aberration (SA4) and secondary spherical aberration (SA6) in various levels. Subjective DoF was defined as the visual interval for which three 20/50 high-contrast letters was perceived acceptable (objectionable blur limits). We used an adaptive optics system to dynamically correct the observer's aberrations and control their accommodation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To study the impact on the subjective depth of field of 4th-order spherical aberration and its combination with 6th-order spherical aberration and analyze the accuracy of image-quality metrics in predicting the impact.
Setting: Laboratoire Aimé Cotton, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.
Design: Case series.
We measured high-contrast visual acuity (VA) and 12c/deg contrast sensitivity (CS) through-focus functions (TFF) of four eyes of four cyclopleged subjects in three conditions: naked eye, with a center-distance and center-near Proclear(R) multifocal addition 2D contact lens. In all conditions, an adaptive optics system statically compensated the astigmatism of the subject's eye alone. Multifocal contact lenses enlarged the width of the curve of through-focus visual performance but reduced the peak performance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: The two objectives were 1) to measure visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) losses induced by various amounts of individual Zernike aberrations, and 2) to examine the accuracy of image quality metrics in predicting these visual performance losses.
Methods: Monocular 10 cycles/degree (cpd) and 25 cpd CS and high- and low-contrast VA were measured when introducing individual Zernike aberrations in four patients dynamically corrected using a CRX1 adaptive optics system (Imagine Eyes) and a 5.5-mm pupil.