The callosal dilemma: explaining diaschisis in the context of hemispheric rivalry via a neural network model.

It is often suggested that a major factor in diaschisis is the loss of transcallosal excitation to the intact hemisphere from the lesioned one. However, there is long-standing disagreement in the broader experimental literature about whether transcallosal interhemispheric influences in the human brain are primarily excitatory or inhibitory. Some experimental data are apparently better explained by assuming inhibitory callosal influences.

Interhemispheric effects of simulated lesions in a neural model of single-word reading.

A neural model consisting of paired cerebral hemispheric regions interacting via homotopic callosal connections was trained to generate pronunciations for 50 monosyllabic words. Lateralization of this task occurred readily when different underlying cortical asymmetries were present. Following simulated focal cortical lesions of systematically varied sizes, acute changes in the distribution of cortical activation were found to be most consistent with experimental data when interhemispheric interactions were assumed to be excitatory.

Computational studies of lateralization of phoneme sequence generation.

The mechanisms underlying cerebral lateralization of language are poorly understood. Asymmetries in the size of hemispheric regions and other factors have been suggested as possible underlying causal factors, and the corpus callosum (interhemispheric connections) has also been postulated to play a role. To examine these issues, we created a neural model consisting of paired cerebral hemispheric regions interacting via the corpus callosum.