A proof-of-concept-to-confirmatory multiple adaptation design in the development of an anti-viral treatment.

In the clinical development of some new infectious disease drugs, early clinical pharmacology trials may predict with high confidence that the efficacious doses are well below the range of the safety margin. In this case, a dose-ranging study may be unnecessary after a proof-of-concept (PoC) study testing the highest dose. A multi-stage adaptive design spanning both PoC and confirmatory stages is proposed in this context.

Addressing Challenges and Opportunities of "Less Well-Understood" Adaptive Designs.

The draft adaptive design guidance released by FDA in 2010 included references to adaptive study designs that were described as "less well-understood." At that time, there was relatively little regulatory experience with such designs, and their properties were felt to be insufficiently understood. In order to promote greater use of adaptive designs, especially those categorized as less well-understood, the Best Practice Subteam of the DIA Adaptive Designs Scientific Working Group (ADSWG) has worked on describing and characterizing these designs, identifying challenges associated with them and suggesting improvements to design or study conduct aspects that might make them more acceptable.

Conditional bias of point estimates following a group sequential test.

Repeated significance testing in a sequential experiment not only increases the overall type I error rate of the false positive conclusion but also causes biases in estimating the unknown parameter. In general, the test statistics in a sequential trial can be properly approximated by a Brownian motion with a drift parameter at interim looks. The unadjusted maximum likelihood estimator can be potentially very biased due to the possible early stopping rule at any interim.