Purpose: This experimental study was undertaken to examine the fixation characteristics of a six-finned acetabular cup in both primary and revision arthroplasty in comparison with two other commonly used cup designs without fins.
Methods: All three cup designs (Ananova® [Intraplant], Plasmacup® NSC [Aesculap]; Exceed ABT™ [Biomet]) were implanted into validated models of normal and revision acetabula. The defect models were designed to simulate a dorso-cranial rim defect of 90° width and 10 mm in depth (moderate rim defect) and a dorso-cranial rim defect of 130° width and 15 mm in depth (severe rim defect).
The aim of the paper was to compare primary biomechanical stability of different arthrodesis screws (7.3 mm AO screw with and without washer, 6.5 mm Herbert screw and 6.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Sufficient inter-fragmentary compression is helpful to achieve successful bony fusion in hindfoot arthrodesis using internal fixation by screws. Beside bone quality, the design of a screw influences inter-fragmentary compression. Compressive force is achievable for any kind of screw system; however, the primary deformation of the bone is different for the different screw systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF