Publications by authors named "William Forson"

Article Synopsis
  • The response rate for returning the kits was 20.5%, with older women showing higher participation; 12% tested positive for HPV mRNA.
  • Findings suggested that while self-sampling is feasible, only 1 in 5 women responded, indicating a need for future research on the effectiveness of reaching out to women who initially declined to engage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We evaluated the longitudinal performance of three options: HPV16/18 genotyping (HPV16/18), cytology (LBC), and p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology (DS) for the triage of high-risk Human Papillomavirus-positive (Hr-HPV+) women within the cervical screening program in Scotland.

Methods: Data were derived from a cohort of Hr-HPV+ women (n = 385) who participated in PaVDaG (Papillomavirus Dumfries and Galloway) study. Performance of triage strategies for detecting high-grade disease was assessed at 3 (in women <50 years) or 5 years (in women >50 years).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Self-sampling provides a powerful means to engage women in cervical screening. In the original Papillomavirus Dumfries and Galloway study (PaVDaG), we demonstrated cross-sectional similarity of high-risk human papillomavirus (Hr-HPV) testing on self-taken vaginal vs clinician-taken samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or worse (CIN2+). Few data exist on the longitudinal performance of self-sampling; we present longitudinal outcomes of PaVDaG.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Several options for the triage of high-risk HPV screen-positive (hrHPV) women were assessed. This study incorporated CIN2 cases and controls, all of whom tested hrHPV and whose results of liquid-based cytology (LBC), HPV16/18 genotyping, and p16/Ki67 cytoimmunochemistry were available. Sensitivity and specificity for the CIN2 of these triage tests were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF