Sutural deformation during bone-anchored maxillary protraction.

Introduction: Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) is an emerging treatment option for orthopedic correction of maxillary deficiency in young patients. Compared to reverse pull headgear (RPHG), it is believed that forces generated during BAMP result in greater circum-maxillary sutural separation, mandibular retrusion, and improved maxillary protraction. Mechanical loading of the circum-maxillary sutures during BAMP is still poorly understood.

Sutural loading in bone- versus dental-borne rapid palatal expansion: An ex vivo study.

Objectives: To measure and compare the success rate and strains generated during bone- (BRPE) and dental-borne rapid palatal expansion (DRPE) at the alveolar bone, zygomaticomaxillary (ZMS) and internasal (INS) sutures. Additionally, the magnitude and the pattern of midpalatal suture (MPS) separation in the 2 groups was assessed.

Setting And Sample Population: The study was performed ex vivo using 28 pig heads.

Deformation of the zygomaticomaxillary and nasofrontal sutures during bone-anchored maxillary protraction and reverse-pull headgear treatments: An ex-vivo study.

Introduction: Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) is an emerging treatment that involves applying a protraction load to the maxillary bone. Although it is believed that such an approach results in better sutural separation, this has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess and compare the deformation of 1 circumaxillary suture (zygomaticomaxillary suture [ZMS]) and 1 facial suture (nasofrontal suture [NFS]) during BAMP and reverse-pull headgear (RPHG) treatment.