Exploring Zirconia Adhesion: Pre and Postsintering Physical Surface Treatment, Chemical Treatment, and Cement Interactions.

Adhesion to zirconia remains a significant dental challenge. This study is aimed at assessing the bond strength of zirconia based on surface treatment with pre or postsintering sandblasting associated with different chemical treatments and resin cements. Zirconia blocks were divided into 12 experimental groups based on the surface treatment (presintering sandblasting or postsintering sandblasting/tribochemical abrasion treatment), chemical treatment (none, Single Bond Universal, or Signum Zirconia Bond), and choice of cement (Panavia F or RelyX™ U200).

Correlation between polymerization stress and interfacial integrity of composites restorations assessed by different in vitro tests.

Objective: to correlate polymerization stress data obtained under two compliance conditions with those from different interfacial quality tests.

Methods: Six commercial composites were tested (Filtek Z250/3M ESPE, Heliomolar/Ivoclar Vivadent, Aelite LS Posterior/Bisco, Filtek Supreme/3M ESPE, ELS/Saremco and Venus Diamond/Heraeus Kulzer). Bond strength (BS) was evaluated by push-out test on slices of bovine dentin (2-mm thick) with tapered cavities.

Association of different primers and resin cements for adhesive bonding to zirconia ceramics.

Purpose: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) to zirconia ceramics using different associations of primers and resin cements.

Materials And Methods: Two blocks of LAVA zirconia (3Y-TZP) were randomly submitted to an application of three different commercially available primers: Alloy Primer (AP), Z-Prime Plus (ZP), and Signum Zirconia Bond (SZB). Nonprimed specimens were considered controls.

Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer.

This study assessed the finishing and polishing of 3 ceramic materials: Vitadur Alpha, IPS Empress 2 and AllCeram. Surface modification techniques were selected to simulate dental practice. Forty-five specimens of each ceramic were divided into 5 groups of 9 specimens, which were finished using the following procedures: Group 1--glaze; Group 2--glaze, grinding and subsequent polishing with the Eve system; Group 3--glaze, grinding and subsequent polished with the Identoflex system; Group 4--glaze followed by polishing with Identoflex; Group 5--glaze, grinding and subsequent polishing with Shofu kit.