[Development of criteria for the prospective assessment of the need for updating guideline recommendations: The AGIL criteria].

Background: Evidence-based guideline and vaccination recommendations should continuously be updated to appropriately support health care decisions. However, resources for updating guidelines are often limited. The aim of this project was to develop a list of criteria for the prospective assessment of the need for updating individual guideline or vaccination recommendations, which can be applied from the time a guideline or guideline update is finalised.

How to choose appropriate direct oral anticoagulant for patient with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

The novel oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are becoming more common in clinical practice for the prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The availability of several agents with similar efficacy and safety for stroke prevention in NVAF patients offers more selection, but at the same time requires certain knowledge to make a good choice. This comparative analysis provides an appraisal of the respective clinical trials and highlights much of what remains unknown about four FDA-approved agents: dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban.

Failure of dabigatran and rivaroxaban to prevent thromboembolism in antiphospholipid syndrome: a case series of three patients.

Direct oral factor inhibitors (DOFIs) are an attractive alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the treatment of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In the absence of prospective, randomised trial data, reports of therapeutic failures in clinical practice alert clinicians to potential limitations of DOFI therapy for this indication. Data for all cases were collected from a centralised system that contains complete medical records of all patients treated and followed at Mayo Medical Center.