Background: Owing to concerns attributable to problems associated with metal-on-metal bearing surfaces, current evidence for the use of hip resurfacing is unclear. Survival rates reported from registries and individual studies are controversial and the limited long-term studies do not conclusively allow one to judge whether hip resurfacing is still a reasonable alternative to conventional THA.
Questions/purposes: We asked whether the long-term survival rate of hip resurfacing is comparable to that of conventional THA and certain factors can be identified that influence serum ion concentration 10 years postoperatively.
Background: Deficiencies of the acetabular bone stock are an increasing and challenging problem in revision hip surgery. The LOR oblong revision cup is a valuable option in revision hip surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes with the LOR revision cup in hips with acetabular bone deficiency, analyze the complications, and identify predictors of survival rate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Currently, total hip replacement (THR) is most commonly performed via a posterior or a direct lateral approach, but the impact of the latter on the invention's outcome has yet not been quantified.
Methods: We compared the short-term outcome of cementless THR using the both approaches in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. 60 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis were included.
The wear of 8 femoral and 2 acetabular components of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (Midland Medical Technologies Ltd, Birmingham, UK) was measured using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM5; SIP, Geneva, Switzerland). After a median in situ time of 13 months, measurements of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing femoral heads revealed a median volumetric wear of 2.9 mm(3).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEarly results of contemporary hip resurfacing are encouraging and consequently an increasing number of this procedure has been performed worldwide. A theoretical advantage of hip resurfacing is that failed components can be revised safely and successfully revised to a conventional total hip arthroplasty. As the number of systematically analyzed failures is still limited, however, current data from the literature cannot substantially support this assumption.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF