Publications by authors named "W Vanduffel"

Background: [Ga]PentixaFor detects C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) overexpression in various malignancies, such as multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, as well as in endocrine and inflammatory disorders. This study aimed to develop an AlF-labeled radiotracer derived from LY2510924 for CXCR4-targeted imaging, leveraging the physical and logistical advantages of fluorine-18.

Methods: We designed a CXCR4-specific radioprobe, [F]AlF-NOTA-SC, based on LY2510924 by incorporating a triglutamate linker and NOTA chelator to enable AlF-labeling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • There is currently a lack of cross-species brain atlases, making it difficult to compare brain connectivity patterns directly between humans and chimpanzees.
  • The newly developed Chimpanzee Brainnetome Atlas (ChimpBNA) revealed significant connectivity divergences in areas like the lateral temporal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, with genetic factors that could explain these differences in brain connectivity patterns. *
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) often encounters image quality degradation due to magnetic field inhomogeneities. Conventional passive shimming techniques involve the manual placement of discrete magnetic materials, imposing limitations on correcting complex inhomogeneities. To overcome this, we propose a novel 3D printing method utilizing binder jetting technology to enable precise deposition of a continuous range of concentrations of ferromagnetic ink.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) is overexpressed in many cancers, e.g. multiple myeloma and acute leukemia, yet solely [Ga]PentixaFor is used for clinical PET imaging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How is conscious experience related to material brain processes? A variety of theories aiming to answer this age-old question have emerged from the recent surge in consciousness research, and some are now hotly debated. Although most researchers have so far focused on the development and validation of their preferred theory in relative isolation, this article, written by a group of scientists representing different theories, takes an alternative approach. Noting that various theories often try to explain different aspects or mechanistic levels of consciousness, we argue that the theories do not necessarily contradict each other.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF