In a global context, the pernicious effects of colonialism and coloniality are increasingly being recognised in many sectors. As a result, calls to reverse colonial aphasia and amnesia, and decolonise, are getting stronger. This raises a number of questions, particularly for entities that acted as agents of (previous) colonising countries and worked to further the progress of the colonial project: What does decolonisation mean for such historically colonial entities? How can they confront their (forgotten) arsonist past while addressing their current role in maintaining coloniality, at home and abroad? Given the embeddedness of many such entities in current global (power) structures of coloniality, do these entities really want change, and if so, how can such entities redefine their future to ensure that they are and remain 'decolonised'? We attempt to answer these questions, by reflecting on our efforts to think through and start the process of decolonisation at the Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM) in Antwerp, Belgium.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: The objective of this study was to identify the factors that influenced the poor performance of the Community Observatory on Access to Health Services (OCASS) project during its implementation from 2014 to 2017 in Guinea and to formulate recommendations for the rest of the project.
Methods: This was a qualitative study using the multipolar performance framework of B. Marchal et al.