Certepetide (aka LSTA1 and CEND-1) is a novel cyclic tumor-targeting internalizing arginyl glycylaspartic acid peptide being developed to treat solid tumors. Certepetide is designed to overcome existing challenges in treating solid tumors by delivering co-administered anticancer drugs into the tumor while selectively depleting immunosuppressive T cells, enhancing cytotoxic T cells in the tumor microenvironment, and inhibiting the metastatic cascade. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted to characterize the concentration-time profile of patients with metastatic exocrine pancreatic cancer receiving certepetide in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, and to investigate the effects of clinically relevant covariates on PK parameters.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Coronary microvascular dysfunction results in angina and adverse outcomes in patients with evidence of ischemia and nonobstructive coronary artery disease; however, no specific therapy exists. CD34+ cell therapy increases microvasculature in preclinical models and improves symptoms, exercise tolerance, and mortality in refractory angina patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. The objective of this research was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intracoronary CD34+ cell therapy in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn 1997, the seminal manuscript by Asahara, Murohara, Isner et al outlined the evidence for the existence of circulating, bone marrow-derived cells capable of stimulating and contributing to the formation of new blood vessels. Consistent with the paradigm shift that this work represented, it triggered much scientific debate and controversy, some of which persists 2 decades later. In contrast, the clinical application of autologous CD34 cell therapy has been marked by a track record of consistent safety and clinical benefit in multiple ischemic conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStandardization of the measurement of pain in clinical trials will reduce variability, thus improving the quality of the data and reducing the number of patients needed to conduct pain trials. Standardization applies to the physical and psychosocial environment surrounding the patient, and there are many elements within this environment that can be effectively controlled. For example, the appearance of the examination room can be selected for neutrality and influences from visitors and staff can be minimized.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF