J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol
September 2000
Using a multidimensional approach to measure stress, this study prospectively examined the influence of maternal stress, social support and coping styles on labor/delivery complications and infant birth weight. Beginning in the third month of pregnancy, stress was assessed monthly. In each trimester, data on social support, coping strategies, lifestyle behaviors and pregnancy progress were collected.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The aim of the present study was to delineate the influence of maternal stress, social support and coping styles on depressed mood during pregnancy and the early postpartum period.
Methods: Beginning in the third month of pregnancy, data on numerous variables including daily stress (Hassles), state-anxiety (STAI-state), pregnancy-specific stress (PEQ) and depressed mood (DACL) were collected monthly. In each trimester social support (SSQ), coping strategies (CISS) and pregnancy progress were assessed.
This prospective study tracked hassles, pregnancy-specific stress, and state anxiety during pregnancy. A second objective was to identify predictors of each stress dimension. Pregnant women (n=161) completed the Hassles Scale, the Pregnancy-Specific Stress Questionnaire (PEQ), and the state-anxiety scale (STAI-state) monthly, beginning in the third month of pregnancy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol
March 1998
This prospective study examines the influence of maternal stress, social support and lifestyle variables reported over the course of pregnancy on subsequent gestational and intrapartum complications. Demographic and biomedical factors were also studied. One hundred and two women were followed on a monthly basis beginning in the third month of pregnancy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTo determine whether older good and poor sleepers with and without insomnia complaints differ in the nature of activities they engage in during periods of nocturnal wakefulness, the authors developed and evaluated the Sleep Behaviors Scale: 60+. Good sleepers (n = 163), low-distress poor sleepers (n = 49), and high-distress poor sleepers (n = 28) were compared on this measure as well as on sleep parameters, personality, lifestyle, and cognitive-affective variables. Findings indicate good psychometric properties for the new measure, offer a rationale for examining the frequency of the nocturnal behaviors reflected by the measure's 4 subscales (Active Behaviors, Relaxation, Cognitive Arousal, and Medication), and suggest a possible role for these behaviors in the etiology and treatment of insomnia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF