Photodegradation of crude oil on a solid support.

The modifications of crude oil after absorption on silica, montmorillonite, and zeolite were studied. Solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis showed that some compounds are kept better by the solid support than other ones. The modifications that occurred were studied considering the relative amount of different classes of compounds, the number of compounds in function of the number of carbon atoms, and the relative amount in function of the number of carbon atoms for different classes of compounds (linear alkanes, branched alkanes, cyclic alkanes, aromatic hydrocarbons, and alkenes).

Photochemical degradation of crude oil: Comparison between direct irradiation, photocatalysis, and photocatalysis on zeolite.

Direct irradiation for 100h of crude oil from Basilicata (Southern Italy) gave in the case of linear and branched alkanes a reduction of 9 and 5%, respectively. On the contrary, cyclic alkanes decreased for 54% while aromatic hydrocarbons showed a reduction of 37%. These results are in agreement with a prevalent electron transfer mechanism.

Photodegradation of crude oil: liquid injection and headspace solid-phase microextraction for crude oil analysis by gas chromatography with mass spectrometer detector.

The fate of crude oil under irradiation is studied. After UV irradiation, the fraction present in the highest percentage shifts from the C8-C9 fractions to C13, using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis in solution. An increase of the relative amount of the C13-C25 fraction is observed, while a decrease in the relative amount of the C7-C12 fractions is present.

A comparison of results obtained using liquid injection and headspace solid-phase microextraction for crude oil analysis by GC with mass spectrometer detection.

Gas chromatographic (GC) analysis in solution and head space solid-phase microextraction (SPME)-GC analysis of a sample of crude oil gave different results. The SPME technique allowed the identification of a larger number of components than by using usual GC-mass spectrometry (MS). The method failed within the range of C14-C25 where GC-MS in solution allowed to obtain more representative results; on the contrary, SPME allowed to obtain data on the presence of volatile compounds that can not be identified in GC-MS analysis in solution.