Analyzing the dynamics of DNA replication in Mammalian cells using DNA combing.

How cells duplicate their chromosomes is a key determinant of cell identity and genome stability. DNA replication can initiate from more than 100,000 sites distributed along mammalian chromosomes, yet a given cell uses only a subset of these origins due to inefficient origin activation and regulation by developmental or environmental cues. An impractical consequence of cell-to-cell variations in origin firing is that population-based techniques do not accurately describe how chromosomes are replicated in single cells.

Decreased MCM2-6 in Drosophila S2 cells does not generate significant DNA damage or cause a marked increase in sensitivity to replication interference.

A reduction in the level of some MCM proteins in human cancer cells (MCM5 in U20S cells or MCM3 in Hela cells) causes a rapid increase in the level of DNA damage under normal conditions of cell proliferation and a loss of viability when the cells are subjected to replication interference. Here we show that Drosophila S2 cells do not appear to show the same degree of sensitivity to MCM2-6 reduction. Under normal cell growth conditions a reduction of >95% in the levels of MCM3, 5, and 6 causes no significant short term alteration in the parameters of DNA replication or increase in DNA damage.

A mitosis block links active cell cycle with human epidermal differentiation and results in endoreplication.

How human self-renewal tissues co-ordinate proliferation with differentiation is unclear. Human epidermis undergoes continuous cell growth and differentiation and is permanently exposed to mutagenic hazard. Keratinocytes are thought to arrest cell growth and cell cycle prior to terminal differentiation.

Cohesin organizes chromatin loops at DNA replication factories.

Genomic DNA is packed in chromatin fibers organized in higher-order structures within the interphase nucleus. One level of organization involves the formation of chromatin loops that may provide a favorable environment to processes such as DNA replication, transcription, and repair. However, little is known about the mechanistic basis of this structuration.

A novel mouse c-fos intronic promoter that responds to CREB and AP-1 is developmentally regulated in vivo.

Background: The c-fos proto-oncogene is an archetype for rapid and integrative transcriptional activation. Innumerable studies have focused on the canonical promoter, located upstream from the transcriptional start site. However, several regulatory sequences have been found in the first intron.

Subcellular imaging of dynamic protein interactions by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer.

Despite the fact that numerous studies suggest the existence of receptor multiprotein complexes, visualization and monitoring of the dynamics of such protein assemblies remain a challenge. In this study, we established appropriate conditions to consider spatiotemporally resolved images of such protein assemblies using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) in mammalian living cells. Using covalently linked Renilla luciferase and yellow fluorescent proteins, we depicted the time course of dynamic changes in the interaction between the V2-vasopressin receptor and beta-arrestin induced by a receptor agonist.

A muscle-specific promoter directs Pitx3 gene expression in skeletal muscle cells.

The Pitx homeobox transcription factor genes have been implicated in different developmental processes, including determination of hind limb identity for Pitx1, left-right asymmetry for Pitx2, and eye development and survival of midbrain dopaminergic neurons for Pitx3. Pitx1 and Pitx2 have partly redundant activities in craniofacial development, including in pituitary organogenesis, as indicated by their names. These genes also exhibit redundant activities in the control of hind limb bud growth.

Sequential expression and redundancy of Pitx2 and Pitx3 genes during muscle development.

The myogenic program is controlled by different groups of transcription factors acting during muscle development, including bHLH muscle regulatory factors (MRFs), the paired factors Pax3 and Pax7 and the homeobox factors Six1 and Six4. This program is critically dependent on MRFs that target downstream muscle-specific genes. We now report the expression of Pitx2 and Pitx3 transcription factors throughout muscle development.