Phase III study comparing sequential versus alternate administration of cisplatin-etoposide and topotecan as first-line treatment in small cell lung cancer.

Aim: To compare the efficacy and tolerance of sequential versus alternate front-line administration of cisplatin-etoposide (PE) and topotecan (T) in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Patients And Methods: Patients were randomized to receive either 4 cycles PE (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v.

Predictive value of D-dimer plasma levels in response and progressive disease in patients with lung cancer.

Patients with cancer may present with one or more circulatory markers of haemostatic activation which may be associated with tumor growth and cancer cell dissemination. In our clinical practice we observed haemostatic abnormalities with or without thrombotic episodes in cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to detect the D-dimer plasma levels in advanced-stage lung cancer patients before, during and after chemotherapy, and to determine whether there is a correlation with response rate, disease recurrence and survival, in order to estimate the possible predictive value of D-dimer plasma levels.

Cisplatin plus etoposide chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation therapy for patients with limited stage small cell lung carcinoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a cisplatin plus etoposide regimen followed by thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation chemotherapy in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Patients And Methods: Thirty-nine patients with limited SCLC were enrolled onto this study. Patients received three courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.

Alternate paclitaxel-gemcitabine and paclitaxel-vinorelbine biweekly administration in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase II study.

Background: In the present study, 3 cytotoxic agents were combined as front-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. All 3 drugs have been used in other 2-agent combinations and have been shown to be effective as first-line therapy.

Patients And Methods: Sixty-one (53 male, 8 female, median age 65 years old) out of 67 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity.

Sequential versus alternating administration of cisplatin/etoposide and topotecan as first-line treatment in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: preliminary results of a Phase III Trial of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

Background: This trial was designed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of sequential versus alternating administration of cisplatin/etoposide and topotecan in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Patients And Methods: Two hundred eighty-four chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized between the sequential therapy arm (n=142; 4 cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 intravenously [I.V.

Mesothelioma: treatment and survival of a patient population and review of the literature.

Background: Our purpose was to evaluate the survival of patients with pleural and intraperitoneal malignant mesothelioma and, particularly, to estimate the efficacy of chemotherapy as well as radiotherapy and surgery. A review of the literature with respect to these parameters is included.

Patients And Methods: Thirty-five patients with malignant mesothelioma (28 with pleural and 7 with intraperitoneal) were enrolled.

Phase II study of cisplatin-combined schedules as second-line chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cisplatin- (CDDP) combined chemotherapy in non-cisplatin pretreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The second cytotoxic drug administered was either etoposide or gemcitabine. First-line treatment was based on paclitaxel combined with either carboplatin or vinorelbine.

Response to radiotherapy in brain metastases and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

The present study involves non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients with brain metastases, who were treated with radiation therapy, and our aim was to determine response rate and survival. A total of 167 patients were recruited, 155 (125 male, 30 female) of whom were evaluable. Performance status was 0-2 and histology or cytology included 66 (42.

Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study.

To compare irinotecan (CPT-11)+gemcitabine vs CPT-11 alone as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after docetaxel-cisplatinum-based therapy. A total of 147 evaluable, pretreated patients, with NSCLC, received either gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8)+CPT-11 (300 mg m(-2), day 8) (Group A, n=76) or CPT-11 (300 mg m(-2), day 1) (Group B, n=71), every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity.

Front-line paclitaxel-vinorelbine versus paclitaxel-carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III trial.

Purpose: This randomized phase III trial of advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was designed to compare a standard treatment such as carboplatin (CRP)-paclitaxel (PCT) with a new combination, vinorelbine (VRL)-PCT-two agents acting in microtubules.

Patients And Methods: Three hundred and sixty patients (stage IIIa, IIIb and IV) were included and evaluated for response rate, survival and toxicity. Arm A patients were treated with the control combination of CRP 6 AUC and PCT 175 mg/m(2) repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles, and arm B with the investigational combination of VRL 25 mg/m(2) and PCT 135 mg/m(2) repeated every 2 weeks for nine cycles.

A multicenter phase II study of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in previously treated patients with small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in pretreated patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Patients And Methods: Twenty-two pretreated patients (median age 61 years, PS: 0-1 in 77% and 2 in 23%) with limited or extensive stage disease were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 8, every 21 days. Fifteen (68%) of the 22 patients had received two prior regimens and fourteen (64%) were refractory to front-line chemotherapy.

Amifostine reduces radiochemotherapy-induced toxicities in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Radiochemotherapy (RCT) is an effective treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but can be limited by acute and late toxicities (esophagitis, pneumonitis, and myelosuppression). This trial investigated whether pretreatment with amifostine (Ethyol, WR-2721; MedImmune, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD), a radioprotector, could reduce the incidence of RCT-induced acute and late toxicities. Between October 1997 and August 1999, 73 patients with previously untreated stage IIIa-IIIb non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to treatment with RCT alone or RCT plus amifostine (300 mg/m(2) daily intravenous infusion).

Paclitaxel and vinorelbine combination in advanced inoperable adenocarcinoma of the lung: a phase II study.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of paclitaxel (PCT) combined with vinorelbine (VRL) in adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Patients And Methods: Untreated inoperable patients with metastatic disease were enrolled and underwent front-line treatment with a new combination as follows: a 30-minute infusion of VRL at a dose of 25 mg/m2 followed by a 3-hour infusion of PCT 135 mg/m2. Chemotherapy was repeated every 2 weeks with the intention of administering 9 cycles.

Cisplatin-etoposide alternating with topotecan in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A multicenter phase II study.

Purpose: In order to investigate the feasibility of a potentially non-cross resistant drug regimen, we alternated cycles of cisplatin-etoposide with topotecan as front-line treatment in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Patients And Methods: Thirty-six previously untreated patients with extensive stage SCLC received cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) IV on days 1-3 on cycles one, three, five and seven and topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) IV on days 1-5 on cycles two, four, six and eight.

Comparison of docetaxel/cisplatin to docetaxel/gemcitabine as first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: early results of a randomized trial.

The study compares docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) and docetaxel plus gemcitabine (DG) regimens for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were randomized to receive either the DC or the DG combination. They were stratified according to age, performance status (PS) and stage of disease.

A multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing paclitaxel-cisplatin-etoposide versus cisplatin-etoposide as first-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Previous phase I-II studies have shown that the combination of paclitaxel-cisplatin-etoposide (TEP) is very active and well tolerated in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In order to compare the TEP combination to cisplatin etoposide (EP) regimen as front-line treatment in patients with SCLC, we conducted a randomised multicenter study.

Patients And Methods: One hundred thirty-three chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically proven limited or extensive stage SCLC were randomised to receive either paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.

Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial.

Background: Docetaxel in combination with cisplatin or gemcitabine are active chemotherapy reigimes against non-small-cell lung cancer. We compared the efficacy and safety of a combination of cisplatin and docetaxel (group 1) with that of gemcitabine and docetaxel (group 2) in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial.

Methods: Patients with stage IIIB or IV lung cancer who had not had prior chemotherapy were allocated either to group 1 and treated with docetaxel (100 mg/m(2), day 1) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), day 2) or to group 2 and treated with gemcitabine (1100 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8) and docetaxel (100 mg/m(2), day 8).

Expression of p16(INK4A) and alterations of the 9p21-23 chromosome region in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: relationship with tumor growth parameters and ploidy status.

The 9p21-23 chromosome region harbors a number of known and putative tumor-suppressor genes (TSGs). The best characterized gene in this area is p16(INK4A) (CDKN2A). Alterations of its product have been observed in various malignancies, including non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs).

Second-line chemotherapy with cisplatin-ifosfamide in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with carboplatin-cyclophosphamide.

In an effort to use antineoplastic drug combinations which are active in platinum resistant ovarian cancer or which can induce a second response after a platinum first-line treatment, we conducted a study on 30 ovarian cancer patients previously treated with carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide who were given ifosfamide 5 g/m2 i.v. divided over days 1 to 3 plus mesma combined with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.

Alterations of the p16-pRb pathway and the chromosome locus 9p21-22 in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: relationship with p53 and MDM2 protein expression.

The p16-pRb and p53-MDM2 pathways represent vital cell cycle checkpoints. Recent studies provide evidence that these pathways are directly linked via MDM2-pRb interaction and p53 suppression of the RB1 gene. In the present study we investigated the alterations of this G1 phase protein network using immunohistochemical and molecular methods in a series of 68 non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) and correlated the findings with clinicopathological features and prognosis of the patients.

Optimal duration of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a randomized study of 4 versus 6 cycles of cisplatin-etoposide.

With the purpose of investigating whether the 6-course standard dose treatment of etoposide-platinum (EP) in small cell lung cancer could be reduced to 4 courses without compromising patient's survival, 70 patients were randomized to receive either 4 or 6 cycles of etoposide 120 mg/m2 i.v. days 1-3 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 day 1.

Chemotherapy of non small cell lung cancer. A prospectively randomized study of cisplatin-etoposide versus cisplatin-mitomycin-vinblastine.

Based on preclinical studies showing synergism between cisplatin and etoposide, we randomized patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to receive either the above combination (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1, etoposide 130 mg/m2 days 1-3) or the combination of cisplatin-mitomycin-c and vinca drugs (MVP) (cisplatin 100 mg/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, mitomycin 10 mg/m2 day 1), a regimen with a steady response rate. Partial responses were achieved in 12/44 (27%) of the cisplatin-etoposide group and in 11/43 (26%) of the MVR group. No difference in median survival could be demonstrated between the two groups (36 weeks versus 38 weeks).

Immunohistochemical and molecular evaluation of the mdm-2 gene product in bronchogenic carcinoma.

In this study, we investigated immunohistochemically the expression of mdm-2 protein in 93 surgically resected bronchogenic carcinomas. The findings were correlated with p53 protein detection status and clinicopathologic data (histologic type, differentiation grade of the lesions, lymph node metastases, and smoking history of the patients). Thirty of the 93 immunohistochemically examined specimens were subjected to Northern blot and differential polymerase chain reaction analysis to look into the mechanism of mdm-2 overexpression.

C-erbB-2 oncoprotein expression in operable non-small cell lung cancer.

Although c-erbB-2 oncoprotein immunohistochemical expression has been thoroughly studied in a variety of human tumors, its prognostic significance remains unclear. Moreover, differences in assessment criteria further complicate the evaluation of c-erbB-2 as a prognostic marker. In the present study we examined the expression of c-erbB-2 protein in 107 patients suffering from operable (T 1,2-N0, 1 staged) non-small cell lung cancer (30 adenocarcinomas and 69 squamous cell carcinomas) treated with surgery alone.