Correction: A Radiological Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01232-1.].

Robotic-assisted versus conventional hip arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of perioperative blood management and early outcomes.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty (RATHA) versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty (CTHA) on perioperative blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in patients with hip arthritis.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study, conducted at a high-volume tertiary care center from January 2021 to January 2023. Two hundred patients undergoing primary THA, were equally divided between RATHA (using the MAKO SmartRobotics system) and CTHA cohorts.

A Radiological Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Purpose: This study investigates the radiological outcomes of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RATHA) compared to manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA), addressing the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of RATHA in achieving superior implant positioning accuracy.

Methods: A prospective cohort of 212 patients (103 robotic, 109 manual) underwent THA and were evaluated for postoperative radiological outcomes, focusing on the inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular cup. Outlier prevalence was assessed based on angles outside the defined Lewinnek safe zones.

Pre-operative planning and templating with 3-D printed models for complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Background: Complex primary and revision THR requires comprehensive understanding of abnormal bony anatomy. Evaluation and classification of acetabular bone defects is essential to manage them appropriately. It is difficult to appreciate complex defects using conventional 2-Dimensional radiological modalities.