Publications by authors named "V M Walley"

Background: Studies of the performance of the automated FocalPoint Guided Screening (FPGS) imaging system in gynecologic cytology screening relative to manual screening have yielded conflicting results. In view of this uncertainty, a validation study of the FPGS was conducted before its potential adoption in 2 large laboratories in Ontario.

Methods: After an intense period of laboratory training, a cohort of 10,233 current and seeded abnormal slides were classified initially by FPGS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The authors have recently investigated the histologic estimation of coronary artery stenoses (CAS) to determine its reproducibility and the effect of training on reproducibility. The present study extends this work, examining the accuracy, the sensitivity, and the specificity of the estimation of CAS. Further, the effect of one histologic variable (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pathologists and surgeons often encounter cardiac valves with focal or patchy abnormalities either at postmortem examination or during the assessment of a valve removed at surgery. Many health professionals including nurses, cardiologists, echocardiographers, sonographers and radiologists may be called upon to assess these lesions. With the development of increasingly more sophisticated and sensitive imaging techniques, including transesophageal echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging, more valve lesions are being discovered.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Histologic estimation of coronary artery stenoses (CAS) provides the 'gold-standard' for clinicopathologic correlations and medicolegal investigations, yet little evidence supports histology as a reproducible diagnostic measure, and none addresses the effect of training on its use. To study these questions, 20 randomly selected Movat-stained coronary artery cross-sections were reviewed 3 times, at 3-month intervals, by six clinical pathologists (CPs), six pathology residents (Res), seven anatomic pathologists (APs), and two cardiovascular pathologists (CVPs). Before the third iteration, a guide to CAS assessment with illustrations was provided.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF