Objective: This study aimed to determine which pedagogic method, online workshops or live medical education, was the better way to teach about self-medication for middle school students.
Methods: The following groups were formed: group O (students receiving online education), group L (students participating in live medical education animated by a medical practitioner and a science teacher) and group C (students without any medical learning). To compare them, the students answered three multiple choice questions before and after the educational intervention.
Purpose: Our purpose was to quantify stresses in the bone surrounding stemless implants in various configurations.
Methods: A detailed finite element model of the glenohumeral joint was used to simulate abduction kinematics before and after arthroplasty and to measure bone stresses around the implants. Two digital patients were simulated: one healthy and one with supraspinatus muscle impairment (deficiency).
Purpose: Stress shielding in short-stem arthroplasty can cause critical metaphyseal bone loss. If the size and shape of the humeral shaft are important factors, it is unknown whether the shape of the polyethylene component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) affects bone stress around or within the stem. We explored the impact of polyethylene shape on humeral and scapular stress distribution using a finite element model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTo assess the immediate and six-month follow-up effects of medical education simultaneously provided by a practitioner and a science teacher on middle school students regarding self-medication and knowledge of the healthcare system. Two groups were constituted: the learning group (L group), with students receiving an interactive medical education, and the control group (C group), which included students without medical education. Both groups were evaluated by using a six-multiple choice question (MCQ) evaluation form: three times for L group - just before the medical workshop (T0), immediately after the medical workshop (T1) and at six-month follow-up after the medical workshop (T2) - and only the evaluation at T0 for students in C group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF